https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743 > > Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > The testcases fail on x86_64 with -m32: > grep 'loop with . iterations completely unrolled' pr61743-1.c.128t.cunroll > pr61743-1.c:25:5: note: loop with 8 iterations completely unrolled > pr61743-1.c:16:5: note: loop with 8 iterations completely unrolled > pr61743-1.c:16:5: note: loop with 3 iterations completely unrolled > pr61743-1.c:29:5: note: loop with 2 iterations completely unrolled > pr61743-1.c:24:3: note: loop with 4 iterations completely unrolled > grep 'loop with . iterations completely unrolled' pr61743-2.c.128t.cunroll > pr61743-2.c:25:5: note: loop with 8 iterations completely unrolled > pr61743-2.c:16:5: note: loop with 8 iterations completely unrolled > pr61743-2.c:16:5: note: loop with 3 iterations completely unrolled > pr61743-2.c:29:5: note: loop with 2 iterations completely unrolled > pr61743-2.c:24:3: note: loop with 4 iterations completely unrolled > (latest trunk). With -m64 they work fine. Huh, it passed for me ontop of r219648. Let me re-check.