http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60809
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed| |2014-04-30
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6)
> I see nothing that says anything about the sequencing of side effects in
> initialization expressions with respect to the actual initialization
> itself, or parts thereof - either to require a particular sequencing, or
> to make it indeterminately sequenced or unsequenced. That may mean it's
> implicitly unsequenced, but I'd suggest raising this with WG14.
Thanks, I'll try to report it then; suspending for now.
