http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60811
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #1) > Though it seems too insignificant to make a change that late > in phase 3, so I think this should wait for 4.10. Seems reasonable to me, but at worst, it's only going to break one architecture and I think I'm right in saying arc isn't a primary or secondary architecture. > Although such a small straightforward bug-fix can hardly considered > Copyrightable, I suppose you are technically the author of a patch, so > it would be SOP to name you in the ChangeLog - unless you don't want that. But I haven't written a patch, I've only reported a bug with a suggested solution. I think who fixes it gets to put their name on the record, not me.
