http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > It could be r200954. The backtrace is similar to the one for > pr58880 (duplicate?). Very likely.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > It could be r200954. The backtrace is similar to the one for > pr58880 (duplicate?). Very likely.