http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5) > (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4) > > Looks similar to PR60495; > > Certainly; this _is_ PR60495. :-) I meant: PR58880