http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60495

--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
> > Looks similar to PR60495;
> 
> Certainly; this _is_ PR60495. :-)

I meant: PR58880

Reply via email to