http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59193

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
a++ and ++a should be treated as similar and don't change the semantics of the
loading from the variable or increase the number of loads if never used for
scalar types.  Now in C++, they are different when you overload them for
classes but we don't use that feature yet.

Reply via email to