http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59384
--- Comment #1 from Balaji V. Iyer <bviyer at gmail dot com> ---
Hi Nick,
I am sorry for taking a while to get back to you. As you can tell from
gcc-patches mailing list, we are actively pursuing to try and push Cilk
Plus into trunk. We have submitted a updated patch for _Cilk_for for review
for trunk in this thread (
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00235.html).
I looked at this bug and it looks like this bug does not appear if you use
_Cilk_for implementation in the thread mentioned above.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
PS. The code snippet could have a race-condition. I think if you switch the
for and _Cilk_for the race might go away.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:09 AM, nick.tomlinson at arm dot com <
[email protected]> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59384
>
> Nick Tomlinson <nick.tomlinson at arm dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Target| |x86_64
> Host| |x86_64
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>
