http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57649
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Isn't it going to cause problems if we fold some accesses to the static var > using the expressions in the initializer, we'd end up with not having the > vars referenced? Well - we are carefully trying to add them at the point we fold ... > If backporting anything, my preference would be to actually backport just > the tree-ssa-live.c change and not the tree-dfa.c change. > Or Eric's patch. Backporting just the tree-ssa-live.c change also works for me.
