http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57649
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Isn't it going to cause problems if we fold some accesses to the static var using the expressions in the initializer, we'd end up with not having the vars referenced? If backporting anything, my preference would be to actually backport just the tree-ssa-live.c change and not the tree-dfa.c change. Or Eric's patch.
