http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-04 16:10:53 UTC --- > How can the patch cause a name collision when all the patch does is > avoid creating a new decl...? They are static and thus should be > mangled. They clearly aren't. > Well, and if we want a new decl just to re-assign a unique name here > then we want to copy over alignment information. That is, LTO should > handle constant-pool entries by _not_ streaming the decl then. Honza, > how are those supposed to make the symtab -> WPA -> LTRANS transition > anyway? The irony being that the initial implementation didn't stream the DECL but was changed because the varpool was just starting to being streamed as well. :-)
