[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309



--- Comment #48 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> 
2013-02-22 13:55:16 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #47)

> 

> Interestingly, the symbolization/debuginfo seems to be completely broken :( 

> 

I've tried compiling with -gdwarf-3 , with some luck