[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309



Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:



           What    |Removed                     |Added

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 CC|                            |Joost.VandeVondele at mat

                   |                            |dot ethz.ch



--- Comment #44 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> 
2013-02-22 08:31:11 UTC ---

(In reply to comment #43)

> 400.perlbench fails with a global-buffer-overflow which clang does not detect.



I'm wondering if the failure goes away compiled with -O0 instead ?