http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55885
--- Comment #4 from kwieder at polytechnic dot edu.na 2013-01-06 12:44:42 UTC --- Hi Jonathan, According to the the standard C++ implementation (a % -b) <==> (a % b), therefore (INT_MIN % -1) <==> (INT_MIN %1) == 0 Neither INT_MIN % -1 nor INT_MIN %1 require a division, therefore there should be no undefined behaviour in the first place. Regards, Klaus On Jan 6, 2013, at 2:26 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-06 12:26:13 UTC --- Are you asking why undefined behaviour doesn't have consistent results?
