http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #38 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-11-15 02:10:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #35) > >> Is that certain to be soon enough > Not 100%. I am just warning you. Considering that the release schedule for llvm 3.2 is close to that of gcc 4.8, it seems unrealistic to expect to be able to replace mach_override in time for the gcc 4.8.0 release. If the existing mach_override is sufficient for llvm 3.2, I suspect we can also live with it (at least until gcc 4.8.1). > > >> Will the replacement of mach_override also depend on the Core Foundation > >> framework? > > That's the question to Alex.
