http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #34 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-11-14 22:09:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > Just want to repeat, that any work on mach_override may end up being wasted > time > because we plan to get rid of mach_override *really* soon. One other question. Will the replacement of mach_override also depend on the Core Foundation framework?
