http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20020
--- Comment #38 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-15
08:57:51 UTC ---
What are the code generation deficiencies you are targeting with this? For
testcase #1 I get
sptr_result:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movq S+8(%rip), %rdx
movq S(%rip), %rax
ret
what would you expect instead?
I don't think we should change MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE, nor make use of
TImode unconditionally.
