http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #72 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-07-30 11:04:39 UTC --- On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 > > --- Comment #71 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-30 > 10:35:48 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #70) > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > So, is this a fortran front-end bug, a middle-end bug, or a lto bug ? > > > (Hint: PR 51765 is a marked as a lto bug ;-) ) > > > > It's a frontend bug. > > great :-(. > > > (In reply to comment #63) > > That's bogus as TYPE_FIELDS > > is supposed to be shared amongst variant types. > > Then we'll have to revert Micha's recursive restrict work. I don't think so, it merely has to be fixed. > Is it possible for the front-end to specify alias sets by hand (I mean without > relying on the middle-end computing them based on types etc)? Yes. But that does not work with LTO, nor does it address the original issue of supporting INTENT IN/OUT properly.
