http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #78 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-01
15:01:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #76)
> You mean
>
> [...]
>
> ? Yes, that also should be build_distinct_type_copy.
>
Even without that, the patch regtests cleanly (including the pr45586 tests),
apart for typebound_proc_20.f90. That one fail in the following line from the
`calc' subroutine:
this%y = this%find_y() ! FAILS
the lhs is a target, and the rhs is NOT a target, so that the middle-end types
are different. :-(
