http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53235
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com> 2012-05-07 14:32:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > The testcase is failing because of the change from "A*" to "struct A*"? Yes. > Is that an important distinction? In other cases it even crashes GDB, originally filed as: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14060 Or I see Internal error: non-aggregate type to value_struct_elt_for_reference Function "policy1::function" not defined. etc. > If so, could you handle the case of a nameless typedef specially on your end? Yes; I wanted to know first if this is an intended change. FYI it does not seem to be DWARF compliant: The typedef entry has a DW_AT_name attribute whose value is a null-terminated string containing the name of the typedef as it appears in the source program.
