http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #25 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-12 08:24:16 UTC ---
If we make an ABI switch at some point, should we move over to relying just on
atomics and the libatomic fallbacks (assuming/hoping libatomic exists by then)?
Also, refcounting in basic_string has bugs too. Do you see other areas of
libstdc++ that could use a review of the synchronization bits?
