http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52838

Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ubizjak at gmail dot com

--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-04-05 12:36:28 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)

> The existence of (subreg/s/u:SI (reg:DI 60) 0) means that (reg:DI 60) is known
> to be a zero-extended 32-bit value, so the optimization is valid (and useful).

Please note similar problem with sign_extend, PR 52876.

Reply via email to