http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #22 from Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier at gmail dot com> 2012-02-23 18:52:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > > Where do you want the second change made? > > > > Let me repeat myself: > > > > the code is in boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h, so the patch should > > change > > the ifdef > > DARWIN block there. > > > > > > In the code in the file I mentioned, as a replacement to the #define that > > exists today. > > Yes, See the reduced patch I posted in comment 17. Also, if thread_leak_test.c > is twitchy with -pie at -m64, we could also open a PR for that and just skip > this test on darwin11+ at -m64 for now. Assuming that my proposed reversion of > r175182 causes no regressions in libjava on darwin11+. It seems there is already a PR for thread_leak_test.c failure: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 Patrick.
