http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #21 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-02-23 18:50:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > > Where do you want the second change made? > > Let me repeat myself: > > the code is in boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h, so the patch should change > the ifdef > DARWIN block there. > > > In the code in the file I mentioned, as a replacement to the #define that > exists today. Yes, See the reduced patch I posted in comment 17. Also, if thread_leak_test.c is twitchy with -pie at -m64, we could also open a PR for that and just skip this test on darwin11+ at -m64 for now. Assuming that my proposed reversion of r175182 causes no regressions in libjava on darwin11+.
