http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #31 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-16 21:07:50 UTC --- For the record, I'm still a little uncomfortable with this. It feels too much like a hack to me. Eric knows this stuff much better than I do though, so if he's happy, I'll cede to him. (In reply to comment #29) > > > Note that reapplying r181405 with the Richard Sandiford's patch at > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02004.html fixes the > > > failures on > > > powerpc-apple-darwin9 without visible side effect on > > > x86_64-apple-darwin10. > > I am attaching the resulting patch for revision 183181. Could it be tested on > the platforms for which revision 181405 caused some failures: i.e., AIX > (comment #12, tested without regression on Darwin), mips-linux-gnu (comment > #18), and SH target when compiling for big endian (comment #19). It was fine on mips64-linux-gnu (including 32-bit multilibs) when I tested it originally, so a thumbs up from that point of view. Richard
