http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251
--- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill <joel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-21 14:06:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > > The issue is that when running on real hardware, you can't use arbitrary cpu > > flags and expect it to work. And it is wrong to say xfail on sparc-rtems > > because they could work on another board running rtems. Just not this one. > > ...yes, that's why we have the dg-require-effective-target framework now. I am thinking this may be a broader case than just that the CPU model on the target doesn't have a particular feature. sparc-rtems is different from sparc64-rtems. sparc-rtems is ONLY 32-bit v7 and v8. What's the simplest way to indicate that no 64-bit, VIS, etc tests are applicable?
