http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50684
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-12 22:07:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > > The following (equivalent) variant is at least rejected by gfortran 4.5 on > > upwards: > > > > TYPE MY_TYPE > > INTEGER, ALLOCATABLE :: VALUE > > END TYPE > > CONTAINS > > SUBROUTINE sub (dt) > > type(MY_TYPE), intent(in) :: dt > > deallocate(dt%VALUE) > > No, that version is *not* equivalent. In the previous example you have a > *pointer intent*. Well, comment #5 is 'equivalent' to comment #3: Both have a non-pointer intent (which is what you suggested in your initial comment to my patch). > In any case, the example of comment 5 is clearly invalid. Ok, good that we agree on that at least ;) By the same reasoning, comment #3 should be invalid, since they both do the same thing wrt the argument 'dt' (namely deallocating its value component).
