http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-09-22
22:46:26 UTC ---
Good, let's close this as invalid, then.
Thanks for clarifying the error_at thing, I should give it more thought: I was
under the impression that we tend to avoid (not a strict rule) things like
"error: unions cannot have base classes" because on a given line a lot can
happen (other errors together with good code) and an accurate column number is
anyway less convenient (for sure to a human like me!) than a name.
