http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48934
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-09 20:10:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > If I understand your proposal correctly, we'd get something more like: > > foo.C:blahblah: error: no matching function for call to foo > foo.C:blahblah: note: candidate is foo(blahblah) > foo.C:blahblah: error: [some explanation] > > which doesn't seem quite right. Having it use the error tag rather than note is suboptimal, but I think getting helpful error messages with relatively minimal compiler changes outweighs that aesthetic concern. :)
