http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-21 12:39:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > It is implicitly in the manual as those that are not mentioned as enabled by > > Wall or Wextra. > > So "The list in the manual already." is false. The information is in the manual, even if not as an explicit list. I expect adding an explicit list would soon get out of date as it just increases the burden on contributors when adding new options. > > It would be nice to have a list of options enabled by default > > and another list of options never enabled by default or by other option. > > However, I doubt that any of the current GCC devs will ever bother to create > > such lists, so if you are interested, please send a documentation patch. It > > is > > a matter of reading about all warning options mentioned in > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/ and creating the lists. > > I'll have a look. > However, I still think an option to really enable (almost) all warnings should > be added. I don't agree with the comments in the earlier report. The fact you don't agree doesn't change the fact this is a duplicate of that report, marking it as such helps keep the discussion in one place. Please don't reopen this report. If you want a new one for the documentation issue please open a new PR.
