http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-21 12:30:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > I'll have a look. > However, I still think an option to really enable (almost) all warnings should > be added. I don't agree with the comments in the earlier report. Feel free to create a patch http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html and submit it for review to gcc-patches. I think the general consensus among GCC devs is that such an option is not wanted, but if you still think is good, discussing it without a patch that defines exactly which options should be enabled is pointless. There are literally thousands of bugs that GCC devs would like to see fixed (search for NEW or REOPENED bugs) and several other thousands UNCONFIRMED bugs that need to be reviewed and confirmed. Keeping this one open forever is just distracting and a waste of time and effort! I am not going to close it again. If I have convinced you of the negative impact, please close this as DUPLICATED as Andrew did, or at least put it in WAITING. Otherwise, I guess in a few years you will have forgotten about this, and some GCC dev after stumbling into it for the nth time will close it forever.
