http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #20 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-13 11:00:52 UTC --- Based on Honza's comment #17 I proposed a different patch, making sure we update the statement as expected, like I described in comment #18 and I have already posted it to the mailing list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00789.html
