http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-07 09:28:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) [...] > This has been implemented as a fix for PR46971. Is there any issue left to be fixed? I think there isn't. (Except for an accepts-invalid diagnostic for comment 7 [module "m" vs. subroutine "m", which USEs "m"], which is now PR 47203.) If there is none, I would propose to close this PR as fixed.
