http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-01-05 22:31:14 UTC --- > * We should use i?86*-*-* (or perhaps just i?86-*-*, I see no reason for the > first *). I don't think this cover x86_64-*-*, this is why I have tested *86*-*-* > * The comment should be updated (perhaps with PR #s) to provide documentation > for the XFAILed changes. See the end of comment #2. This should probably addressed by the objc maintainers.
