http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2010-11-15 18:05:11 UTC --- On 11/15/10 08:14, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 > > --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther<rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-15 > 15:10:12 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #6) >> On 11/15/10 05:40, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297 >>> >>> Bernd Schmidt<bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: >>> >>> What |Removed |Added >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> CC| |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org >>> >>> --- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt<bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-15 >>> 12:30:26 UTC --- >>> Jeff, what have you found? >>> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00634.html >> >> Waiting for review... > You don't need explicit approval for this middle-end patch. Noted. More than happy to consider postreload.c part of the middle end :-) I wouldn't mind hearing from Bernd to ensure that I'm marking the reg as being used in an unknown fashion correctly, but if I haven't heard from him in a few days, I'll go ahead and check it in. jeff
