------- Comment #12 from don dot wakefield at gmail dot com 2010-09-10 15:24 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Sure. What I meant - contrary to wait you said, I think - is that an elegant > and complete solution to this issue involves changing much more generally our > code to *always* behave as if fseek(off * width) were called, not just > fseek(0) > in the special case you care about.
Okay, I understand better now. My apologies, and thanks for your comments on this issue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45628
