------- Comment #3 from hlprasu at gmail dot com 2010-07-07 09:30 -------
Subject: Re: Static members not initialised in explicit
template instances of library
But, as I know, no where is it mentioned to be necessary for static
member initialisation. Why should the compiler allow for such a subtle
error? Or is this documented somewhere?
Besides this issue, I've not faced any other problem in using shared
library by not using -fPIC. Could you please point out the necessary
implications that I am missing here?
On 7 July 2010 14:48, redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-07 09:18 -------
> You need to use -fPIC for a shared object, so the version without that is not
> valid.
>
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44855
