------- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-06-09
19:19 -------
Subject: Re: bunch of warnings of "second definition" on osf
I've regularly seen those warnings, but ignored them since I've found no
ill effect and the testsuite largely passes (which doesn't use the
static libstdc++.a anyway).
While I do have Tru64 UNIX sources, the compilation tools (including nm,
ar, and ld) are missing, so I cannot use that source to shed some light
on the warning, and binutils aren't an option yet since they don't
allow a bootstrap to finish.
Unless the reporter can provide evidence that this warning causes actual
problems, I'd suggest to close this as INVALID.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44475
