------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-03 20:14 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > That @n is definitely a pasto: there is no n among the parameters. And the > semantics definitely boils down to taking the whole C string. Understand that > often the documentation is not written by the same people maintaining the > code, > unfortunately. Anyway, I'll fix it as soon as mainline unfreezes. Thanks for > pointing it out.
You can fix documentation now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43634
