------- Comment #21 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-03-28 17:30 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
regression caused by r147852
> > I think I saw one but it was wrong. I would be interested to at least know
> > what this patch is about :)
>
> It's about not accounting static called once functions twice when
> decreasing overall unit size.
Ah, I saw that one and I think it was wrong (and that is also why it regressed
on tramp3d). I will dig it out.
Honza
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436
