------- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-03-28 16:43 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > ------- Comment #17 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-03-28 16:33 ------- > Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size > regression caused by r147852 > > > Indeed. > > > > There is also some miscounting of overall unit size, Micha has a patch for > > that (but it completely chokes tramp3d results). There is also the > > Where is the patch? Somewhere - you have to as Micha. > > early inliner cleanups I have done at some point. Thus, I suppose we can > > look at this early during 4.6 development again. > > Well, those should not affect the resulting inlining, right? In theory not. In practice it removes the iteration if I remember correctly. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436