------- Comment #19 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-10 23:51 ------- Good to hear that. I don't think there is a need to reopen the bug since it is most probably a duplicate of PR 42450 which has a testcase and is being dealt with.
Thanks for testing, though. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41290
