------- Comment #25 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-02-18 08:00 -------
> Would you mind testing the attached patch?
Apparently the patch in comment #23 does not fix the problem (incremental
update of gcc and partial test):
make -k check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=complex*.f90
--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'"
Running target unix/-m32
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp as
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
=== gfortran Summary for unix/-m32 ===
# of expected passes 104
Running target unix/-m64
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp as
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_5.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_5.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test
=== gfortran Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes 102
# of unexpected failures 2
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 206
# of unexpected failures 2
/opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran version 4.5.0
20100215 (experimental) [trunk revision 156774p2] (GCC)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42220
