------- Comment #15 from albrt2000 at gmail dot com 2010-02-08 14:49 -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> Basing on Core 906, seems rather straightforward that the snippet is
> ill-formed, the only problem is that neither 4.4 nor current mainline reject
> it.
That's also should be the case for non public access :
struct A {
private : /* or protected */
~A() = default;
};
should also be illed formed according to that report.
> If that's the complete analysis, the issue is pretty low priority.
Destroying an object from a base class pointer whose destructor is not virtual
is an undefined behaviour according to the standard. I tend to think that
silently removing the virutal property when considering the default
declaration, introduces a serious bug in the code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42983
