------- Comment #11 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2010-02-08 14:04
-------
(In reply to comment #9)
> I'm not sure to understand your last comment (sorry I 'm not a natural english
> speaker). Do you mean that virtual ~A() = default; should be an error ? If we
Yes. GCC implements the resolution to core issue 906
> can not default virtual destructor, well, the feature seems less interesting.
You can do it, but not on the first declaration:
struct A {
virtual ~A();
};
A::~A() = default;
I think this should be OK (but maybe not in GCC 4.4 only in 4.5)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42983
