------- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-11-27 09:48 ------- Subject: Re: Weird translation of DO loops
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #15 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 23:43 > ------- > (In reply to comment #14) > > > Looks much better than the current situation. Is there a valid > > reason for the character(kind=4) casts? I would have thought > > that this should be a integer(kind=4). > > The casts are generated for unsigned types, which we need because > the difference between two integers can be larger than huge(integer). > Beats me why this is character instead of unsigned. Well, in that case you can as well rely on twos-complement arithmetic and avoid all the overflow issues? Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42131
