------- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 22:07 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > } > countm1.1 = (((character(kind=4)) D.1338 - (character(kind=4)) D.1337) * > (character(kind=4)) step_sign.2) / (character(kind=4)) (step_sign.2 * D.1339); > > implementing the multiplication idea outlined above, and passes at > least do_3.F90. > > Better?
Looks much better than the current situation. Is there a valid reason for the character(kind=4) casts? I would have thought that this should be a integer(kind=4). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42131
