------- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-05-11 13:10 ------- Subject: Re: bad optimization(?) pure virtual function call with -O2
On Mon, 11 May 2009, jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #11 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-05-11 13:09 > ------- > It does seem to be a regression. I preprocessed the program in comment 4 with > GCC version 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42), then ran uninclude to produce a > standalone testcase and compiled it with different versions of GCC > > GCC 4.1.1 (FSF) at -O3 doesn't call the pure virtual. > GCC 4.1.2 (Red Hat) at -O3 doesn't call the pure virtual. > GCC 4.2.2 (FSF) at -O3 calls the pure virtual. > GCC 4.3.2 (FSF) can't compile the program (again, due to Boost's heavy use of > preprocessor checks) > > Do you want that unincluded testcase attached? No, that's enough info. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39509
