------- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-05-11 12:44 ------- Subject: Re: bad optimization(?) pure virtual function call with -O2
On Mon, 11 May 2009, jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #9 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-05-11 12:42 > ------- > The testcase will have included lots of code from Boost headers conditionally > based on __GNUC__ etc. so it's not surprising it doesn't compile with 4.1 or > 4.2 > > If wanted I can produce an unincluded version using 4.1 and 4.2, but I assume > there's no point as those branches are closed. Right. I was trying to check if this is a regression or not. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39509
