------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-04-20 15:59 
-------
For the record, I essentially agree with Falk, we are talking about a basic
core language behaviour, in general we don't have switches to create different
minor dialects of C++ at will... By the way, let's not encourage the use of
"STL", an acronym obsolete since the first C++ Standard, in 1998.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39798

Reply via email to