------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-04-20 15:59 ------- For the record, I essentially agree with Falk, we are talking about a basic core language behaviour, in general we don't have switches to create different minor dialects of C++ at will... By the way, let's not encourage the use of "STL", an acronym obsolete since the first C++ Standard, in 1998.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39798