------- Comment #1 from falk at debian dot org 2009-04-20 15:28 ------- Removing the default constructor is a bad idea, since it would break about any available library including the standard lib in subtle ways, and would make g++ pretty much unusable.
But apparently this isn't actually what you really want anyway, but actually you want to be able to create STL containers with uninitialized memory. This seems to me a pretty unusual requirement, and it could be achieved by creating a wrapper class for int with empty constructor, so I don't think this justifies language or library changes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39798
